Tag Archives: purchasing power

Best of ZeroHedge: On The World’s Reserve Currency

But it is JPMorgan’s Michael Cembalest who frames it the best, “I am reminded of the following remark from late MIT economist Rudiger Dornbusch: ‘Crisis takes a much longer time coming than you think, and then it happens much faster than you would have thought.'”

20120103_JPM_reserve

ZeroHedge: On The World’s Reserve Currency: What’s Past Is Epilogue (Jan 3, 2012)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Economics, Politics

Shock: Weak Dollar Lifts Equity Markets

Not a lot of time to read the news lately, but I caught a Bloomberg Op-Ed today, ‘Strong Dollar Advocates Make a Weak Case: Schnidman and Nadler‘.

In it, the authors claim that, “What gets lost in this clamor is any discussion of winners and losers from a strong U.S. currency”. They go on to detail their research in comparing the S&P 500 to a dollar index:

This comparison of USD (U.S. Dollar Index) and the SPX (S&P 500) shows that on each of the seven occasions since 2008 when the dollar index reached an intermediate high, the S&P 500 hit an intermediate low. Perhaps no other asset in recent years has traded as precisely in (inverse) tandem with the market as the U.S. dollar. A weaker dollar might be easy fodder for politicians seeking to score rhetorical points, but it also has provided fuel for every intermediate market rally since 2009.

Firstly, it seems that one could argue from this data that monetary policy is being used solely to benefit equity investors, and that the Federal Reserve has largely achieved this goal.

Secondly, the authors seem to be ignoring that a weak dollar causes all prices to rise. While it may be comforting to see the nominal value of your investments go up in the short term, in the long term the purpose of investing is to increase future consumption (aka standard of living). If a weak dollar increases the cost of future consumption more quickly than it does the value of your equity investments, aren’t you still “losing”?

At best, the lift to equity markets described above represents a wealth transfer from holders of other asset classes (ex. cash, real estate) to holders of equities. One could call this an extremely regressive tax, as equity owners are more likely to have a higher economic status. As I’ve mentioned elsewhere, IRS statistics on top wealth-holders show that 55% of the increase in wealth enjoyed between 1992 and 2004 was due to increasing securities prices alone.

As I have not yet amassed enough wealth to gamble it in equity markets or anchor it in real estate, I am confined to paying off debts and holding cash (which I’ve hedged). This makes me, a college graduate and young professional, one of the biggest losers from a weak-dollar policy. It erodes both my assets and the purchasing power of my income.

How other young people in similar circumstances (i.e. not having inherited a family fortune or business) can consistently support policies and politicians that explicitly undermine their economic mobility is difficult to understand.

1 Comment

Filed under Economics, Politics, Zeitgeist

Two Fed Economists Sound the Alarm

When a former Fed Reserve Chairman and a [recovering Keynesian] Fed economist sound the alarm, one should take heed.

A Little Inflation Can Be a Dangerous ThingPaul Volcker (New York Times, Sep 18, 2011)

At a time when foreign countries own trillions of our dollars, when we are dependent on borrowing still more abroad, and when the whole world counts on the dollar’s maintaining its purchasing power, taking on the risks of deliberately promoting inflation would be simply irresponsible.

The Soothsayers of MacroeconometricsArnold Kling (The American, Sep 19, 2011)

Until the press, the public, and policy makers understand the utter unreliability of macroeconometric estimates of the impact of policies on employment and growth, the answers provided by the usual suspects are worse than nothing. They give policy makers the illusion of precise control over the economy, based on methods that are no more reliable than soothsaying or entrail-reading.

Interesting Graph: Share of Total Wealth Gain, 1983 – 2009 (Source: Economic Policy Institute)

Related GraphEffective Federal Funds Rate, 1983-2009 (Source: St. Louis Fed)

Leave a Comment

Filed under Economics, Politics, Zeitgeist